|
Revenant is relevant
by Yisrael Medad
September 29, 2002
The American writer Carolyn Wells, who died 60 years ago, asserted
"actions lie louder than words." Be that as it may, words still play an
important part in the craft of fooling people. This is especially so in
the Arab-Israel conflict.
To take one example, the proper nomenclature for the Jewish civilian
residential areas in the disputed territories of Judea, Samaria and Gaza,
as New York Times columnist William Safire has indicated, should be
communities rather than the pejorative "settlements." Jews live in
communities or, for that matter, in cities, towns and villages. They do
not live in "settlements."
In his August 5, 2001 column, On Language, Safire wrote: "Words have
connotations. In the disputed territory known as the West Bank, an Israeli
village is called a settlement, implying fresh intrusion; a small
Palestinian town, even one recently settled, is called a village, implying
permanence." Of course, his use of "disputed" rather than "occupied," or
for that matter, "liberated," in another example of the importance of the
terminology one uses.
This phenomenon, of harnessing language to political ideology, is not
exceptional nor is it new. In a volume discussing political geography,
Richard Muir deals with an "image system" whereby a subjective perception
of reality is promoted via language so as to achieve superiority either at
negotiations or other actions that will help establishing borders to
territories.
The use of "occupied" and of "settlements" and "settlers" is a projection
of a desired reality. That Israel's official state institutions such as
the Foreign Ministry's information services and their employees continue
to use these very terms is unfortunate, to say the least.
But what should we term the Jews who live in the territories? A substitute
for the word "settlers" has been hard to come by. I once introduced myself
to a British Foreign Office official as a "Jewish resident of a community
in Samaria." Puzzled momentarily, he quickly interjected "but I thought I
was to converse with a settler." Clearly, a more accurate noun is needed,
one that is more relevant to the reality.
It is revenant.
THE DICTIONARY defines a revenant is one who returns after a lengthy
absence. A revenant can be any person who shows up after a long absence
such as those who come back to their ancestral home after years of
political exile. This is the classic definition although Sir Walter Scott
used it in his novel The Fair Maid, to denote a ghost. It stems from the
French "revenir," which means simply "to return."
Jews lived in the hills of Judea and Samaria for over 3500 years, as
nomads, as tribal chieftains and as kings, priests and prophets. They were
dispersed once and returned. They were exiled and returned.
Despite foreign conquerors, they persisted in returning under the most
difficult of political, religious and economic conditions. Their
civilization was created in the area as was their literature. Their three
most important cities are there.
The Torah and the New Testament use the terms Judea, Samaria and Gaza. The
Quran records God's command that the Jews should live in the Promised
Land. Eighty years ago, the world recognized unabashedly and with no
disagreement the right of Jews to reestablish their historic homeland as a
political entity. And following a brief 19 year long hiatus, Jews are once
again living there.
Revenant, then, may be the word we need to employ.
If one is referred to as a settler, immediately the audience is disposed
to consider the object as a near-monster, an oppressor, one who doesn't
belong and so forth. The person described as a "settler' loses his
humanity. He is a stereotype.
Those who contend that Jews possess no rights in Judea, Samaria and Gaza,
have an easier task if they talk about a "settler." A revenant, on the
other hand, belongs. He has rights to the land, both his personal location
and the collective geography.
Good linguistic advice is that to own a word, one should use it ten times.
I have employed it four times in this article. Perhaps you will join with
me in multiplying its use?
The writer resides in Shiloh and comments on political, media, and
cultural affairs.
|