ARCHIVE of Previous Selected multilingual items, as of August 19, 2007

                List of such items, to be read down below:

                                        

v      EUROVISION in FINLAND; 'TEAPACKS' won over POLITICS - TAP and David Frankfurter15 March 2007

v      Mobilize now, save the world - By Natan Sharansky - February 12, 2007

v      Why did you kill your grandmother? –Jan 25, (Excellent 'Hasbara tool)

v      Europe is Finished, predicts Mark Steyn  by Daniel Pipes – English belo:in Arabic, Danish, Dutch, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish each on the relevant pages

v      Israel, Palestinians and the Big Lie - by Jeff Ballabon    

v      NEWS Items  -  From the website of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs  

v      Reader's Letter to Wall Street Journal: "Mother Mosque"

v      Once again: Disproportionate? - Take-A-Pen editorial    'EU Coalition for Israel' met incoming German EU-presidency        

v      IDF aerial attack in GazaIDF Spokesman's announcement   -   

v      Svenska! New PM  Fredrik Reinfeldt: "Skapat en balanserad syn på USA och Israel... tv4.se/nyheter/489984.html more on our Swedish pg

 

 

 

Fredrik Reinfeldt, new PM of Sweden:
'More balanced approach to Israel'

v      Reader's Letter on 'Civilian victims': 'Mindless repetition'     

v      DISPROPORTIONATE? Blatant Hypocrisy! by Frederick Forsyth       

v      Norsk! Jostein Gaarders hatefulle kronikk mot Israel: Avisen har også et ansvaron Norwegian page

Horrible Hate Speech from Norway: God's chosen people- Jostein Gaarder Read below in  English

v      To SkyNews: Balance your reporting on Cease-fire -    Letter by Maurice O.

v      Letter-Writing Call: Nasrallah to Court for War Crimes! 

v      Good News about the Finnish Media - Varpu Haavisto

v      First Take-A-Pen letter ever from the Mars!To The Independent    

v      The Pretext 'Israeli OCCUPATION' Down – Arab TERROR Up- Ch. Krauthammer

v      Final Report on BBC 'Impartiality Review' publishedREAD Take-A-Pen's 5 Studies, like: (I) BBC's 'Jenin–massacre' that never was;

(IV) BBC - an Accomplice to Terror? -      Read in the separate BBC frame on Home page

v       Ideas About Denmark - NOT about caricatures  Read below

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Read the latest few of the above titles:

 

4) EUROVISION in FINLAND; ISRAEL, 'TEAPACKS' and POLITICS – and update!

 

Do you remember the good old times when Israel won three times the Eurovision song contest?

Once with the song "Abanibi Obo'ehev" sung by Izhar Cohen and once with "Hallelujah" sung by Gali Atari and the "Milk and Honey" trio. And, DANA International. Good old times. Since then politics entered this contest and in recent years Israel enjoyed  sometimes rather cool hospitality.

Read here David's letter about calamities in Finland, this year's host of the Eurovision     (E.M.)

          Update!15.3.2007  The Eurovision organizers accepted yesterday all the songs submitted, including 'Push the button' of Israeli pop-band 'Teapacks'. Is it perhaps the victory of public pressure, like David's letter below?

 

Dear Friends,

 

Israeli band Teapacks has created quite a storm with its song "Push the Button".  It's been selected to represent Israel in the coming Eurovision song festival. While it is a question (at least to me) whether it has sufficient artistic merit to win, strange things have happened with this song. The Finnish contest organizers have made sure that it does get ample publicity. Accusing the song of being inappropriately political, the Finns are scrambling for ways to ban the song from the competition. 

The lyrics are a protest against nuclear weapons in the hands of unstable political leaders.  And Kobi OZ, Teapacks' founder and lead singer, probably knows what he is singing about.  He comes from the southern Israeli town of Sderot - now best known as an everyday target for Palestinian rocket squads firing from the Gaza Strip.  

Blogger
Tundra Tabloids points out that the Finnish 1982 Eurovision entry was the group Kojo, titled "Nuku Pommin" ("Bomb Out" or better yet "Sleep while the bombs fall"), which told of the threat to Europe during the height of the Cold War when many in Europe were against the US deployment of nuclear tipped cruise and Pershing missiles.  That is the Finns are allowed to sing about rocket threats, only Israelis may be not. While you ponder the hypocrisy of Finland joining the club of peoples offended by Jews objecting to being the victims of another holocaust, you can click the links and judge the music and the lyrics of the song yourself.
 

David

"letter from Israel" 

at http://dfrankfurter.livejournal.com/110694.html 

 

PS: Here are the links for the HTML deprived; The song "Push the Button" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_h_rLKTLvs  ;

And "Nuko Pommin" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8HdS0ukSwk

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EUROVISION in FINLAND; 'TEAPACKS' won over POLITICS  -  Scroll down in this window to read it below

- David Frankfurter's letter - 10 March 2007 – Update 15 March 2007

 

 

The Isreali TEAPACKS band with Kobi Oz in the center

                               (Photo: Effi Sharir)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

5) Mobilize now, save the world
By Natan Sharansky

Jerusalem Post,  February 12, 2007

Just over three years ago, at the first-ever global forum on anti-Semitism organized by the State of Israel, the essential task was to define the beast - the new anti-Semitism. Since then, as the fourth such global gathering  meets this week, efforts to incorporate the "three-D" distinction between  legitimate criticism of Israel and the new anti-Semitism: Double standards, Demonization and  Delegitimization,  have become part of international documents and discourse.

 

The "three-D" distinction between  legitimate criticism of Israel and the new anti-Semitism:

Double standards, Demonization and  Delegitimization.

 
These and other accomplishments, as important as they are, have been dwarfed by the quantum leap anti-Semitism itself has taken. It has leapfrogged from isolated attacks against Jews to incitement to genocide - the actual elimination of the Jewish state.

This shift has come in the form of a pincer movement. On one side, we have the Iranian regime, which is denying the Holocaust and calling for Israel to be "wiped off the map" while racing to develop the physical means of doing so. On the other side, we have what is, in effect, international silence in response, coupled with growing willingness to discuss Israel's existence as a mistake, an anachronism, or a provocation.

We must recognize the fact that though sympathy for Iran's expressed goal of Israel's destruction is hardly mainstream, the idea of a world without Israel is more acceptable in polite company, the media and academia today than Hitler's expressed goal of a Europe without Jews was in 1939.

Given this situation, it should be clear that we are beyond the stage of definitions. The Jewish world now must mobilize at a level no less than during the struggles to establish the State of Israel and to free Soviet Jewry. It is this latter struggle that presents the most potent model for action today.

Though both sides of the genocidal pincer are in quite advanced stages of development, the Jewish world remains mired in pre-mobilization debates reminiscent of the early stages of the Soviet Jewry struggle in the 1960s. This may be hard to recall in light of the subsequent success, but back then a debate raged among Jews over whether a campaign to free Soviet Jewry was "too parochial," and whether being out front risked making it too much of a "Jewish issue."

BEFORE THESE internal debates were resolved the Soviet Jewry effort could not be regarded as a movement, capable of attracting allies and moving governments. Nor were such debates easily, or ever fully, put to rest.


As late as 1987, when the by then mature and powerful movement organized the largest-ever Soviet Jewry rally on Washington's mall to coincide with Mikhail Gorbachev's visit, some Jewish leaders wondered if the community could be mobilized, and if such a rally would be counterproductive. They warned that only a few thousand souls would brave the winter weather, and that the Jewish community would be considered "warmongers" who were spoiling the recent warming of US-Soviet relations.

In actuality, over 250,000 people came to a rally that was pivotal in opening the floodgates, not just to 10,000 or 20,000 Jews, which seemed like a dream at the time, but to a million Jews who came to Israel over the following decade.

Since it has been a while, a reminder is in order of what full mobilization looks like.

First, as Shlomo Avineri has recently proposed, Iranian officials should get the Soviet treatment. Just as no Soviet official, including sport and cultural delegations, could travel without being accosted by protests and hostile questions, so it should be with anyone representing the Iranian regime. As in the Soviet case, such protests will not themselves change Iranian behavior, but they are critical to creating a climate that will
influence the policies of Western governments.

Second, an inventory of the governments and companies that provide Iran with refined oil, huge trade deals, and even military and nuclear assistance should be taken and public pressure be put on them to end their complicity with a regime that is racing to genocide.

Third, the pension funds of US states should be divested from all companies that trade with or invest in Iran. This divestment campaign must be pursued without apologies or hesitation.

Fourth, every country that is party to the Genocide Convention should be called upon to fulfill its obligation under that treaty and seek an indictment of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the charge of incitement to genocide, which is a "punishable offense" under Article III of that treaty.

Fifth, human rights groups, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, which are heavily nourished by Jewish values, passion and funding, must stop squeezing both sides of the genocidal pincer. These groups must be challenged, on the one hand, to press for enforcement of the Genocide Treaty, to stand up for human rights in Iran, and to oppose and expose Iranian support for terrorism. On the other, they must stop perverting the sacred cause of human rights into a cudgel in Iran's hands against Israel. This happened just months ago when, during the Lebanon war, such groups all but ignored Hizbullah's terrorism from behind human shields and called Israel's self-defense a "war crime."

JUST AS the two sides of the pincer themselves are connected, so too must be the efforts to combat them. All the above steps concern the Iranian side of the pincer. But combating the other side, the denial of Israel's right to exist, is no less critical - and more difficult, since at times
they necessitate confronting, not a rogue regime, but our own cherished institutions. On this front:

First, universities that provide chairs for professors who campaign against Israel's right to exist should be boycotted. In a number of countries, denying the Holocaust is a criminal act. In the current context, denying Israel's right to exist lays the groundwork for a second holocaust even more directly than does denying history. Therefore, the promulgation of such an ideology should be fought even by societies that justifiably revere freedom of speech.

This may seem a hopelessly difficult task, but it is not. After 9/11, one woman, a student, took on Harvard University, which was ready to accept a $10 million "gift" from a Saudi sheikh. Harvard backed down, showing that moral clarity, unapologetically and passionately expressed, can change seemingly unassailable ideas.

We must stand for a basic principle: If denying the Holocaust can land a professor in jail, denying Israel should not land him tenure.

Second, support for Israel must be demonstrated. Two decades after the massive Soviet Jewry rally of 1987, we need to return to the Mall on Israel's Independence Day in May with two messages: Support Israel and Stop Iran. It is late, but not too late, to overcome those fears of being "too parochial" that the Soviet Jewry movement succeeded in dispelling more than 30 years ago.

The fight to support Israel and stop Iran now is, if anything, less "parochial" than the Soviet Jewry movement was then. Then, the Jewish world took on a global superpower, the Soviet Union, and confronted the reigning American foreign policy paradigm - detente - with a very different one: linkage of trade to human rights.

Then, we successfully argued that the freedom to emigrate was not just a Jewish concern, but a universal one, and we were more right than we knew. The Jackson-Vanik amendment and the Helsinki Accords were critical factors in triggering the internal collapse of the Soviet empire. This collapse not only freed millions of Jews, but all the peoples behind the Iron Curtain, and ended a half-century-old superpower stalemate that threatened the entire planet.

NOW THE WORLD stands at a no less fateful watershed. The world's most dangerous rogue regime is on the verge of obtaining the ultimate weapons of terror. Already, Iran's confidence that it will not be stopped has led to one war, last summer's war in Lebanon started by Hizbullah. Already, Iran is fueling conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon and Gaza - and all this before the regime enjoys its own full, declared nuclear umbrella.The moment before mobilization is always a lonely one, in which it seems that the obstacles to making a cause universal are insurmountable. Yet, as in the case of the Soviet Jewry movement, we are not alone. We are surrounded by potential allies who may not themselves know they are ready to join us until we create a movement for them to join.

Our leadership will give others the opportunity to act. If the Jewish world does not lead the way, who will? It is as true now as it was then; if we build it, they will come.A decade after the wave of democracy that came with the fall of the Soviet Union, an Iranian-led wave of terror is rising that will not stop until it is stopped. Ultimately, we overcame our fear of parochialism to stand up for Soviet Jewry, and left the world a much better place for it. Now we must do the same to prevent a second Holocaust, and in the process save the world.

-------------
The writer is chairman of the Institute for Strategic Studies at the Shalem Center in Jerusalem.  (©) The Jerusalem Post  
Media enquiries to: Stephanie Pearson  (
spearson@shalem.org.il )

 

 

6)       Why did you kill your grandmother?

January 25, 2007

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014973.php

"NEW: Questions As Weapons" by Charles Jacobs unmasks a little-noted rhetorical strategy often employed by the jihadists and their allies:

"Why did you kill your grandmother?” That’s what Professor Ruth Wisse said to an Arab student at Stanford who asked her, “Why is Israel an apartheid state?”

The student was flummoxed and tried again, “Why is Israel an apartheid state?” Wisse again responded, “Come on now, tell us why you killed your grandmother.” A few more rounds of this and the student relented.

According to the Chabad Rabbi who invited Harvard’s Wisse to speak, Wisse then explained how some questions are not questions at all, but weapons: If she would have answered his anti-Israel accusation, she would have been trapped, and done damage to her cause.

Her “grandmother” riposte was the perfect demonstration of that point:

Having to explain why you’re not guilty as charged is a losing proposition.

Yet Jews have allowed themselves to be trapped in a meta-discourse that continuously takes the form: “Israel is bad.” “No it’s not.” Or “It’s not as bad as you say.”

Indeed, much of the history of hasbara – Israeli PR – has been defense against slanderous accusations. The classic handy reference book many students use, “Myths and Facts,” a tome fat with expanded revisions to include the evolving set of lies and half-truths hurled at the Jewish state by Arabist propaganda. The formula of the book, which is the formula for much of [good Israeli] hasbara training, is to set out the “myth” and then answer it with the true “facts.”

Sometimes the “factual” response shows how Israeli conduct is exemplary:

Israel is an apartheid state?” “No,” reads the formula. “Apartheid is something very different and cannot be applied to the condition of Palestinians in Israel, who are in fact treated in many ways better than they are in Arab countries.” Etc.
But even this – “We are much better than you say” doesn¹t work, because as long as the discourse focuses on Israeli behavior, we lose.

What to do? Once armed with the realization that the anti-Israel formula accuses Israel of exactly those crimes the Arab/Muslim world has committed, we can work our way out of the corner:

“You say the Jews are guilty of oppression, apartheid, discrimination, expansion by land theft? Not true. What is true is that the Arab world is guilty of every one of these things.”

Here’s an enhanced “Myths, Facts, and Big Picture” approach:

The Lie: Israel is an apartheid state.
The Truth: That’s ridiculous. (See Myths and Facts on why.)
Transition: But I’m glad you brought up apartheid. Christians are fleeing Palestinian-controlled areas due to Muslim violence. Violence against women, especially “honor killings” where male relatives kill females for “improper” sexual relations, are common in Palestinian territories and throughout the Muslim world. Jews are not even permitted to set foot in Saudi Arabia.

The Big Picture: Something similar to apartheid is found in the Arab world, where women and children, gays and lesbians, and Christians and Jews, are controlled, expelled, tormented and killed. That’s what we should be protesting.

--------------------------------

7)        

Israel, Palestinians and the Big Lie

By Jeff Ballabon                                    3 January 2007

 

Caroline Glick, who is for my money one of the absolute best political analysts on the Middle East, particularly as it concerns Israel and the Palestinians, has a few excellent questions to ask about a 33-year old US State Department cable. The cable, which was just released, shows that our government knew for decades that Arafat/PLO was directly behind anti-American terror and intentionally lied to the public.

 

In her litany of interrogatories, however, Glick fails to point to one of the most culpable conspirators in the ongoing lie that the Palestinians have “moderate” leadership which seeks coexistence rather than jihad - and that is Israel’s government. Glick asks:

 

First, how is it possible that the belated admission of a massive 33 year cover-up of the murder of senior American diplomats spanning the course of seven consecutive presidential administrations has been ignored by the US media?…

 

[W]hat does the fact that under seven consecutive administrations, the US government has covered up Arafat’s direct responsibility for the murder of American diplomats while placing both Arafat and Fatah at the center of its Middle East policy, say about the basic rationale of US policy towards Israel and the Palestinians? What would US Middle East policy looked like, and what would have been the results for US, and international security as a whole, if rather than advancing a policy that made Arafat the most frequent foreign visitor to the White House during the Clinton administration, the US had demanded his extradition and tried him for murder?

 

How many lives would have been saved if the US had not been intent on upholding Arafat’s big lie? How would such a US policy have impacted the subsequent development of sister terror organizations like Hizbullah, al-Qaida and Hamas, all of which were founded by members of Arafat’s terror industry?

 

Good, important questions, all.

 

But, even more than the US, Israel’s government has created the environment for the PLOnoma to spread and metastasize until the Palestinian Arab population flocks to the Hamas banner, while Israel props up, funds, arms and trains Palestinian terror minions. Unless and until Israel comes clean, the US will have little choice but to follow the path Israel has chosen.

 

Israel has missed numerous opportunities since June 1967 to declare and secure her borders with finality and to provide safety for her citizens. Perhaps none were so egregious as the Left’s (Barak’s) collaboration with Clinton to concretize the deadly, destructive mirage of peaceful Palestinian statehood and the Right’s (Sharon’s) failure to realize that with Bush, post 9/11, things were different.

 

After 9/11, more and more people were prepared to understand that Israel has never been the obstacle to peace in the region. More and more people would have embraced an open US-Israel coalition. The tragic, sanguinary folly of Oslo could have been revealed for what it was - but Israel’s leaders chose to continue the deadly farce rather than demand it be ended once and for all.

 

They continue to do so today.

 

Arab culture is venerable, durable, proud, aggressive and different. And very, very dangerous. Islamic identity and pride are on the rise, even as Western identity and pride are faltering. Fatal fantasies about Iraqi democratization and liberalization also are fueled and fed by the woolly ethnocentrism which declares the Palestinians (and Saudis and Syrians, etc.) to be a similar culture of cultural primitives and naifs just awaiting the irresistable call of democracy and Western Civilization. Both America and Israel need to be cognizant that, in the history of human civilization the forces of tribalism and totalitarianism have, thus far, a much more enduring track record than those of democracy and liberalism. We are, as Lincoln memorably described our democracy, a great experiment…an experiment whose longevity is far from proven or ensured.
Nowhere is the West’s demise more imminent than in Israel, a country with military resources to dominate, but with a waning will to fight for survival. Yes, we need to challenge the US for lying to us about who is killing Americans. But Israel also needs to start telling the truth about the Palestinians. Perhaps the State Department won’t back it up, but Americans will.

 

 

8)       Europe is Finished, Predicts Mark Steyn

  • by Daniel Pipes    -    New York Sun*    -     November 14, 2006
  •  

[ *NY Sun title: "Steyn's New Book Combines Humor, Accuracy, Depth"]

Mark Steyn, political columnist and cultural critic, has written a remarkable book, America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It (Regnery). He combines several virtues uncommonly found together – humor, accurate reportage, and deep thinking – then applies these to what is arguably the most consequential issue of our time: the Islamist threat to the West.

Mr. Steyn offers a devastating thesis but presents it in bits and pieces, so I shall pull it together here.

He begins with the legacy of two totalitarianisms. Traumatized by the electoral appeal of fascism, post-World War II European states were constructed in a top-down manner "so as to insulate almost entirely the political class from populist pressures." As a result, the establishment has "come to regard the electorate as children."

Second, the Soviet menace during the cold war prompted American leaders, impatient with Europe's (and Canada's) weak responses, effectively to take over their defense. This benign and far-sighted policy led to victory by 1991, but it also had the unintended and less salutary side-effect of freeing up Europe's funds to build a welfare state. This welfare state had several malign implications.

  • The nanny state infantilized Europeans, making them worry about such pseudo-issues as climate change, while feminizing the males.
  • It also neutered them, annexing "most of the core functions of adulthood," starting with the instinct to breed. From about 1980, birth rates plummeted, leaving an inadequate base for today's workers to receive their pensions.
  • Structured on a pay-as-you-go basis, it amounted to an inter-generational Ponzi scheme, where today's workers depend on their children for their pensions.
  • The demographic collapse meant that the indigenous peoples of countries like Russia, Italy, and Spain are at the start of a population death spiral.
  • It led to a collapse of confidence that in turn bred "civilizational exhaustion," leaving Europeans unprepared to fight for their ways.

To keep the economic machine running meant accepting foreign workers. Rather than execute a long-term plan to prepare for the many millions of immigrants needed, Europe's elites punted, welcoming almost anyone who turned up. By virtue of geographic proximity, demographic overdrive, and a crisis-prone environment, "Islam is now the principal supplier of new Europeans," Mr. Steyn writes.

Mark Steyn, author of "America Alone."

 

 

 

Arriving at a time of demographic, political, and cultural weakness, Muslims are profoundly changing Europe. "Islam has youth and will, Europe has age and welfare." Put differently, "Pre-modern Islam beats post-modern Christianity." Much of the Western world, Mr. Steyn flat-out predicts, "will not survive the twenty-first century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our lifetimes, including many if not most European countries." With even more drama, he adds that "it's the end of the world as we know it."

(In contrast, I believe that Europe still has time to avoid this fate.)

America Alone deals at length with what Mr. Steyn calls "the larger forces at play in the developed world that have left Europe too enfeebled to resist its remorseless transformation into Eurabia." Europe's successor population is already in place and "the only question is how bloody the transfer of real estate will be." He interprets the Madrid and London bombings, as well as the murder of Theo van Gogh in Amsterdam, as opening shots in Europe's civil war and states, "Europe is the colony now."

The title America Alone refers to Mr. Steyn's expectation that the United States – with its "relatively healthy demographic profile" – will emerge as the lonely survivor of this crucible. "Europe is dying and America isn't." Therefore, "the Continent is up for grabs in a way that America isn't." Mr. Steyn's target audience is primarily American: watch out, he is saying, or the same will happen to you.

Pared to its essentials, he counsels two things: First, avoid the "bloated European welfare systems," declare them no less than a national security threat, shrink the state, and emphasize the virtues of self-reliance and individual innovation. Second, avoid "imperial understretch," don't "hunker down in Fortress America" but destroy the ideology of radical Islam, help reform Islam, and expand Western civilization to new places. Only if Americans "can summon the will to shape at least part of the emerging world" will they have enough company to soldier on. Failing that, expect a "new Dark Ages … a planet on which much of the map is re-primitivized."

---------------------------------------------------------------------

9)       NEWS -  29 Dec 2006

 

 

NEWS From the website of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs  - 29 Dec 2006

 

 

Israeli FM Livni and Egyptian FM Gheit hold joint press conference in Jerusalem

 

27 Dec 2006

During the Egyptian FM's visit to Jerusalem, the two ministers discussed both Israeli-Egyptian relations and the Israel-Palestinian conflict - how to promote a process that represents the interests of the moderates in the region.

 

 

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

10)   Reader's Letter
to Wall Street Journal editorial: "Mother Mosque"
           
To: "WSJ"
wsj.ltrs@wsj.com>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 5:33 PM
Subject: Mother Mosque

 

I missed the point of your 12/21/06 editorial "Mother Mosque".   Michael Judge concludes by discussing the "flowers and cards and letters of support being dropped off in front of the Mother Mosque in the days after 9/11".   Apparently, we are supposed to support the Muslims in our community after Islamic terrorist attacks. 

 

However, there is no mention of any reciprocity.   No mention of Muslim sympathy and support for the 9/11 victims.   No mention of Muslims ever protesting Islamic terrorism.

If we all rush over to our nearest Mosque and drop off flowers after the next Islamic attack, won't that encourage them to plan more attacks?

George Vandervoort
Wilmette
, IL
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

11)   Once again: 'Disproportionate?'

Take-A-Pen editorial*           18 November 2006

One of the central questions many viewers of the Arab-Israeli conflict ask again and again is: "Isn't the Israeli response to Palestinian – or other Arab – attacks disproportionate?" And in the question it is easy to hear the suggested answer; that Israel's responses seem to be too harsh. This question comes also from people who sincerely intend to be impartial, like the wise and benevolent British professor who raised it publicly this week. Therefore it deserves full attention and our real, most sincere answers.

This won't be easy.  Formal and human law, our heart and our mind are all suggesting different answers. Authorities like the writer of "the Day of the Jackal" Frederick Forsyth ("Disproportionate? Blatant Hypocrisy!"), the French philosopher Bernard Henry-Levy ("DISPROPORTION?") and several others wrote on this in depth.
Let we try to seek here simpler answers "the Jewish way"; through further questions. Two questions come immediately to mind.

 

The first question was suggested by ex-PM Binyamin Netanyahu. He said in an interview to British Television: "In World War II more Germans, particularly civilians were killed than British and Americans combined, but there is no doubt in anyone's mind that the war was caused by Germany's aggression. And in response to the German blitz on London, the British wiped out the entire city of Dresden, burning to death more German civilians than the number of people killed in Hiroshima."
Were these acts of Britain disproportionate?

Whatever Your answer should be, and without judging Dresden, personally I am very glad to be able to honestly add the side note that Israel has never ever instructed or committed any similar deliberate attack on Lebanese or Palestinian civilians, not even in a thousand-times smaller scale than Dresden.

 

The second question about 'Disproportionate'-ness is my own.  We know that Iran-backed Hizbollah started this last Lebanon war with an aggression: it killed 8 Israeli soldiers and kidnapped two on Israeli soil in an absolutely unprovoked attack on Israel – we remember that Israel withdrew its army years ago from all Lebanese soil. Now think about this; these casualty figures may seem small, but the whole Israel is small. For a medium size country like the UK this would proportionally mean 80 British soldiers killed and 20 abducted, on its own sovereign soil, within one day, by an enemy armed to teeth, operating from a neighboring country.
Wouldn't this be a sufficient reason for the UK to fight that enemy very, very strong?

 

 

The utmost constraint Israel's governments and its Supreme Court instruct and the IDF exercises when civilians are involved, makes the army's military burden sometimes almost unbearable.  For example the Hizbollah's and Hamas' full military leaderships have at least three times escaped total elimination,  when, in order to minimize possible lateral civilian injuries Israel dropped too small bombs (250 kg bombs instead of the 1-ton bomb required by the army for the task) on the terrorists' bunker of command. The leaderships of two of the worst internationally recognized terror organizations could have been decapitated, but were not. In earthly terms it means that with one hand behind the back, crucial battles were lost. The question arising here is the opposite of the usual one. Wouldn't the use of full-size bombs have been justified in these cases? Wouldn't it have been more proportionate to the sufferings these terror organizations and their gang-leaders had already caused to innocent people?

 

 

For an open ending of this contemplation we suggest not one more question but an old saying of Jewish sagas:  "Those who do mercy to cruel people do cruelty to innocent people."

The level of certain military blows to terror, both local and global, might well have really been disproportionate. Maybe too high.

Maybe too low; not enough to crush the snake's head.  

----------------------

* This editorial; was written by Endre Mozes

____________________________________________

 

12)   European Coalition for Israel met with incoming German EU-presidency –

  Increasing Israeli trust in Germany is good for the stability in the Middle East
   - Press release -

 

Berlin. 20 October 2006 - "Israel can expect a more friendly and knowledgeable EU-presidency after the Finnish term ends on the 31st of December".  This was the main conclusion after a delegation from the European Coalition for Israel, lead by Executive Director Rijk van Dam, visited the the German capital Berlin this week. The four day visit came to a close on Friday after the delegation had met with key government officials, members of all of the five political parties represented in the German bundestag and with officials from the foreign ministry.

 

The Coalition was well received by the upcoming German presidency which showed a genuine interest in the fact that Israel has an organised network of grassroot friends from all over the European Union. Several politicians expressed a serious concern over the growing antipathy towards Israel in German media and in the public at large. At the same time the Israeli trust in Germany has paradoxically increased resulting in a request to have Germany sending peace keeping troops to the Lebanese-Israeli border as part of the official UN peace keeping force. 

 

During their four day visit the Coalition delegation brought up a number of issues which will need the attention of the upcoming presidency. Among them were the unclear status of the terrorist organisation Hezbollah, which despite a clear resolution from the European parliament to add the group to the EU black list, is still not officially considered a terrorist organisation. According to the Coalition there are no excuses to keep Hezbollah from the terrorist list regardless of the opposition of some European member states governments. 

 

The Coalition delegation also brought up the issue of the 500 million of tax and duties which the Israeli government are still withholding the Palestinians. There is currently EU-pressure to release the funds but the Coalition stressed that "these funds can under no circumstances go directly to the Hamas lead Palestinian government which would be contrary to EU-policies but to the World Bank and its temporary instrument for funding the Palestinians, TIM."…- "This organisation is the right receiver of any withheld tax money if the funds are going to reach the suffering Palestinian people", vam Dam noted.

 

Apart from these issues the Coalition also discussed the politically motivated definition of a Palestinian refugee which today implies that any children or grandchildren of a Palestinian refugee has the right to call themselves a Palestinian refugee. The Coalition repeated what was said at their 4h Annual Policy Conference in Brussels in September where Dr Juergen Buehler presented a well documented research paper asking the European Union to review the current mandate of UNWRA (United Nation Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near  East ) in the light of the UN refugee convention.

-"The definition of a Palestinian refugee is different from any other refugee, said van Dam. This can hardly be a factor that will enhance the peace process and lead to a just peace."

 

The European Coalition for Israel has also met with representatives of the two previous EU-presidencies Finland and Austria where they have presented issues which are affecting EU-Israeli relations. Each EU-presidency lasts six months during which government officials from the current presidency chair any EU meeting. The upcoming German presidency will start on January 1, 2007 and end on June 30 when the Portuguese government will take over the EU-chairmanship.

 

 

P.O. Box 189                                                                       

FI-00181 Helsinki, Finland

Tel.: + 358-40-8400238

Fax: + 358-96948056

info@ec4i.org

www.ec4i.org  

--------------------------------------------------------------------     

 

13)   IDF aerial attack in the northern Gaza Strip
The Israeli Defense Forces Spokesman's announcement
      - October 10th 2006

Background: Palestinians continue daily to launch from Gaza Kassam rockets against sovereign populated Israeli territories. These Kassam rockets, primitive as they are, have caused already 10 fatalities, all uninvolved civilians.
        This was the Israeli Defense Forces Spokesman's announcement on an IDF aerial attack this day:

 Earlier today, October 10th 2006, in Gaza City, the IDF carried out an aerial attack against a Palestinian operative involved in attacks against IDF forces. The IDF will continue to act with determination against terrorist organizations and terror infrastructure in order to create the conditions for the return of Cpl. Gilad Shalit and to stop terror attacks and the launching of missiles towards Israel.

-------------------------------------------------------------------.

14)   A Reader's Letter about 'Civilian victims'  in Lebanon

                 "Mindless repetition" 
                            Letter in Jerusalem Post       Sunday, September 17, 2006

 

Sir, - In your article "Israel targeted with war crime charges" (September 13), you mindlessly repeat the charge that "Israeli aircraft and artillery killed more than 850 Lebanese during the 34-day conflict most of them civilians…"    What evidence is there that this statement is true?

 

Israel claims to have killed 530-700 Hizbollah fighters. In addition, Lebanese authorities admit that another 70 allied militia and Lebanese army soldiers were killed.  If these figures are given any credence*, then the majority of Lebanese deaths were guerillas and soldiers.

 

STEVEN STOTSKY

Boston, Massachusetts

 

*P.s.: After Jenin, Pallywood, and many more Palestinian and other anti-Israeli fakes and fabrications, one may have good reasons to give credence to Israeli sources. Further on civilian casualties in Lebanon and in Israel you can read in the Letter-Writing Call in the rolling window on the top of this page (Take-A-Pen, E.M.)

----------------------------------------------------------------

 

15)    'DISPROPORTIONATE'!? - Blatant Hypocrisy!

      

 

            Frederick Forsyth*

Daily Express, 11 August 2006


It must surely be true that the level of lies and hypocrisy that a society can tolerate is in direct proportion to the degeneration of that culture.

 

Personally I am not particularly pro or anti Israel, pro or anti Arab or pro or anti Islam. But I do have a dislike of myth, hypocrisy and lies as opposed to reality, fairness and truth.

 

Watching the bombing of Lebanon it is impossible not to feel horror and pity for the innocent civilians killed, wounded or rendered homeless. But certain of our politicians, seeking easy populism and the cheapest round of applause in modern history, have called the Israeli response "disproportionate". Among the politicos are Jack Straw and that master of EU negotiations William Hague.

 

That accusation can only mean: "disproportionate to the aggression levelled against them". Really? Why did the accusers not mention Serbia?

What has Serbia got to do with it?? Let's refresh our memories.

 

In 1999 five NATO air forces - US, British, French, Italian and German - began to plaster Yugoslavia, effectively the tiny and defenceless province of Serbia. We were not at war with the Serbs, we had no reason to hate them, they had not attacked us and no Serbian rockets were falling on us. But we practically bombed them back to the Stone Age.?? We took out every bridge we could see. We trashed their TV station, army barracks, airfields and motorways. We were not fighting for our lives and no terrorists were skulking among the civilian population but we hit apartment blocks and factories anyway. There were civilian casualties. We did not do it for 25 days but for 73. We bombed this little country economically back 30 years by converting its infrastructure into rubble. Why?

We were trying to persuade one dictator, Slobodan Milosevic, to pull his troops out of Kosovo, which happened to be (and still is) a Yugoslav province. The dictator finally cracked; shortly afterwards he was toppled but it was his fellow Serbs who did that, not NATO.

 

Before the destruction of Serbia, Kosovo was a nightmare of ethnic hatred. It still is. If we wanted to liberate the Kosovans why did we not just invade??? Why blow Serbian civilians to bits?

 

Here is my point. In all those 73 days of bombing Serbia I never heard one British moralist use the word "disproportionate". The entire point of Hezbollah is not to resolve some border dispute with Israel; its aim is to wipe Israel off the map, as expressed by Hezbollah's master, the crazed Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran. That aim includes the eradication of every Israeli Jew; i.e. genocide.

Serbia never once threatened to wipe the UK off the map or slaughter our citizens, yet Straw, in office in 1999, and Hague, leading the Conservative Party, never objected to Serbia being bombed.

 

As an ex-RAF officer, I am persuaded the Israelis fighter pilots are hitting civilian-free targets with 95% of their strikes. These are the hits no TV network bothers to cover. It is the 5% that causes the coverage and the horror: wrong target, unseen civilians in the cellar, misfire, unavoidable collateral casualties.

 

Israel has said in effect, "If you seek to wipe us out we will defend ourselves to the death. You offer us no quarter, so we will offer none to you. But if you choose intentionally, inadvertently, or through the stupidity of your government to protect and shelter the killers among yourselves then with deepest regret, we cannot guarantee your exemption."

 

Yesterday we Brits learned that certain elements in our society had tried to organise a mass slaughter of citizens flying out of our airports. We will have to take draconian measures against these enemies in our midst.

 

Will Messrs Hague and Straw complain our methods are disproportionate?

Not a chance. Now that, dear readers, is blatant hypocrisy.

            *(Frederick Forsyth, the author of The Day of the Jackal among other novels)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

16)   Horrifying Hate Speech from Norway!

God's chosen people

       Jostein Gaarder in Aftenposten, August 5, 2006    (Unauthorized translation from Norwegian)

                   [TAP editor: we put a (!!!) sign at the most deceitful distortions and most irresponsible incitements of Jostein only]

Israel is history. We no longer recognize the State of Israel. There is no way back. The State of Israel has raped the world's recognition and will get no peace until it lays down its weapons. The State of Israel in its current form is history.

 

No way back. It is time to learn a new refrain: We no longer recognize the State of Israel(!!!) We couldn't recognize the apartheid regime in South Africa, we didn't recognize the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. And there were many who didn't recognize Saddam Hussein's Iraq, or the Serb ethnic cleansing. So now we must get used to the thought: the State of Israel, in its current form, is history.

 

We don't believe in the illusion of God's chosen people. We laugh at this people's conceits and cry over its misdeeds. To act as God's chosen people is not only stupid and arrogant, but a crime against humanity(!!!). We call it racism.

 

Limits for tolerance

 

Our patience has its limits, and so does our tolerance. We don't believe in divine promises as a basis for occupation and apartheid. We have left the Middle Ages behind us. We are embarrassed by those who believe that the god of plants, animals and galaxies has appointed one particular people as its favorites and given them funny stone tablets, burning bushes and a license to kill.

 

We call those who murder children child-murderers and will never accept that such people have a divine or historical mandate that can excuse their shameful acts (!!!). We can only say: shame over all apartheid, shame over ethnic cleansing, shame over all terrorist acts against civilians, whether perpetrated by Hamas, Hizballah, or the State of Israel!

 

Art of war without scruples

 

We recognize and accept fully Europe's deep responsibility for the fate of the Jews, for the shameful harrassment, the pogroms and the Holocaust. It was historically and morally necessary that the Jews got their own home. But the State of Israel has with its unscrupulous art of war and repulsive weapons massacred its own legitimacy(!!!). It has systematically violated international law, conventions, and numerous UN resolutions and can no longer expect protection from such quarters. It has carpet bombed the world's recognition. But have no fear! The hard times are nearly over. Israel has seen its Soweto.

 

We are at the watershed. There is no way back. The State of Israel has raped the world's recognition(!!!) and will not see peace until it lays down its arms.

 

No defense, no skin

 

May spirit and words blow Israel's apartheid walls over. The State of Israel doesn't exist. (!!!) It is without defense now, without skin. May the world have mercy on the civilian population. Because our prophecies of doom are not directed at the individual civilians.

 

We want the people in Israel everything well, everything well, but we reserve the right to not eat Jaffa oranges as long as they taste badly and are poisonous. We easily managed without the blue apartheid grapes for a few years.

 

They celebrate the triumphs

 

We don't believe that Israel mourns more over 40 Lebanese children than they for the last three thousand years have complained about 40 years in the desert. We take note that many Israelis celebrate such triumphs(!!!) the way they once celebrate the Ten Plagues as "suitable punishment" for the Egyptian people. (In this story the Lord of Israel appears as an insatiable sadist). We ask ourselves if one Israeli life is worth more than 40 Lebanese or Palestinian [lives].

 

For we have seen the pictures of Israeli girls who write hateful messages on the bombs to be released over the civilian population of Lebanon and Palestine(!!!). Israeli girls are not cute when they take pleasure in death and agony(!!!) on the other side of the front lines.

 

Retribution of the vendetta

 

We do not recognize the rhetoric of the State of Israel. We do not recognize the the bloody spiral of retribution of the vendetta and an "eye for an eye." We do not recognize the principle of ten thousand Arab eyes for one or two Israeli eyes. We do not recognize collective punishment or population diets as a political weapon. It's been two thousand years since a Jewish rabbi criticized the ancient doctrine of an "eye for an eye."

 

He said: "All that you would others do for you, you should do for them." We do not recognize a state that is built on anti-humanitarian principles and the ruins of an archaic religion of nationalism and war. Or, as Albert Schweitzer put it, "humanity is to never sacrifice a human for a cause."

 

Mercy and forgiveness

 

We do not recognize the old kingdom of David as normative for the 21st century's map of the Middle East. The Jewish rabbi who claimed two thousand years ago that the kingdom of God is not a resurrection of David's realm, but that the kingdom of God is within us and among us. God's kingdom is one of mercy and forgiveness.

 

It's been two thousand years since the Jewish rabbi disarmed and thoroughly humanized old war rhetoric. Already in his time there were Zionist terrorists(!!!).

 

Israel doesn't listen

 

For two thousand years, we have emphasize the curriculum of humanity, but Israel doesn't listen(!!! – Who is "we"?). It wasn't the Pharisean who helped the man who lay on the side of the road because he had been attacked by robbers. It was a Samaritan, today we'd say a Palestinian. Because first we are human - Christians, Muslims, or Jews. Or as the Jewish rabbi said: "And if ye salute your brethren only, what           do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?" We do not accept the abduction of soldiers. But we do not recognize the deportation of entire groups of people and the abduction of lawfully elected parliamentarians or members of a cabinet, either.

 

We recognize the State of Israel of 1948, but not of 1967. That is the State of Israel that doesn't recognize, respect, and yield to the legal 1948 state. Israel wants more - more villages, and more water. To achieve this some are enlisting God's help to find a final solution(!!!) to the Palestinian question(!!!). Some Israeli politicians claim that the Palestinians have so many countries, while we have only one.

 

USA or the world?

 

Or as Israel's highest protector puts it: "May God continue to bless America." A little child noted this and asked the mother: "Why does the president always end his speeches with God bless America? Why doesn't he say God bless the world?"

 

And then there was a Norwegian poet [Henrik Wergeland] who exclaimed the following childlike sigh: "Why does humanity progress so slowly?" He was the one who wrote so beautifully about the Jew and the Jewess [two epic poems by Wergeland]. But he rejected the the illusion of a chosen people. He called himself a Muslim.

 

Calm and mercy

 

We do not recognize the State of Israel. Not today, as we write this, in our hour of sorrow and rage(!!!). If the nation of Israel should fall under its own acts, and parts of its population must flee the occupied areas and into another diaspora, we say: May those around them show them mercy and calm now. It is always a crime without any mitigating circumstances to lay a hand on refugees and the stateless.

 

Peace and right of passage for the fleeing civilians who no longer have a state that can protect them! Don't shoot at the refugees! Don't aim at them! They are as vulnerable as snails without their houses now, vulnerable like the slow-moving caravans from Palestinian and Lebanese refugees, defenseless as the women, children, and elderly in Qana, Gaza, and Sabra and Shatila (!!!). Give the Israeli refugees shelter, give them milk and honey!

 

Don't let a single Israeli child's life be lost. Too many children and civilians have already been murdered.

 

Technorati Tags: Israel, Jostein Gaarder, Norway, antisemitism

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

17)    LETTER to SkyNews:

       Balance your reporting on the Cease-Fire!

 

Email to news@sky.com                                                    August 14, 2006

Sir,
This morning Sky repeatedly reported that Israel continued to bomb Lebanon until the last moment before the cease fire came into effect.  Not a word was said about the missiles fired by Hezbollah into Israel until the last moment.

Were your reporters unaware that 246 deadly missiles were fired by Hezbollah into Israel yesterday (Sunday), the highest one-day total since the start of the war; or did Sky deliberately avoid mentioning this highly relevant news item?

For your information, eight of the rockets were long-range missiles. One person was killed and nearly 150 required medical treatment. Many houses were badly damaged.  The lone fatality was an Israeli Christian Arab, Madi Hiyat, 83.

 Maurice Ostroff

-----------------------------------------------

 

18)    Take-A-Pen's Letter-Writing Call:

Nasrallah to Court for War Crimes           

                                                          August , 2006

 

We all know that:

- to place military installations in the vicinity of or amidst civilian facilities like residential buildings - is a war crime

- To fire from the vicinity of such facilities and thus to deliberately expose civilian population to high risk - is a war crime.

- To use civilian population as human shield in this or any other way - like military personal and equipment transported together with civilians - is a war crime.

- To do the same even to more protected parts of the population like children and women and to facilities like schools and hospitals - is an aggravated war crime

- To use neutral and protected institutions like UN and ambulances as shields for military actions - is a war crime.

 

Hizballah, led by Nasrallah do all these and many more illegal and war criminal activities as a standard practice, totally disregarding all relevant international laws and conventions.

 

Let's send our letters to our representatives and to the media demanding that

Nasrallah must be brought before an International Court for War Crimes!

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

- See below a few photos damning Hizballah, and later a further few of the THOUSANDS OF EVIDENCES of Hizballah war crimes, like:

- See IDF videos showing Hizballah firing rockets 30 meter 'far' from a residential building and then parking the lorry with the rocket launcher in the parking lot of that residential bldg

- See a photo of the yellow Hizballah flag flying high on a UN post - a cunning crime what caused the IDF hitting by mistake that UN post, unfortunately killing four UN servicemen.

- ......... 

 ----------------------------------------------------

From: T R

To: therealityshow@mail.com

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,,19955774-5007220,00.html

Photos that damn Hezbollah

by Chris Link,                        July 30, 2006 12:00am

THIS is the picture that damns Hezbollah. It is one of several, smuggled from behind Lebanon's battle lines, showing that Hezbollah is waging war amid suburbia.

The images, obtained exclusively by the Sunday Herald Sun, show Hezbollah using high-density residential areas as launch pads for rockets and heavy-calibre weapons.

Dressed in civilian clothing so they can quickly disappear, the militants carrying automatic assault rifles and ride in on trucks mounted with cannon.

The photographs, from the Christian area of Wadi Chahrour in the east of Beirut, were taken by a visiting journalist and smuggled out by a friend.

They emerged as:
- US President George Bush called for an international force to be sent to Lebanon.
- ISRAEL called up another 30,000 reserve troops.
- THE UN's humanitarian chief Jan Egeland called for a three-day truce to evacuate civilians and transport food and water into cut-off areas.
- US SECRETARY of State Condoleezza Rice returned to the Middle East to push a UN resolution aimed at ending the 18-day war, and:
- A PALESTINIAN militant group said it had kidnapped, killed and burned an Israeli settler in the West Bank.

The images include one of a group of men and youths preparing to fire an anti-aircraft gun metres from an apartment block with sheets hanging out on a balcony to dry.

Others show a militant with AK47 rifle guarding no-go zones after Israeli blitzes.

Another depicts the remnants of a Hezbollah Katyusha rocket in the middle of a residential block blown up in an Israeli air attack.

The Melbourne man who smuggled the shots out of Beirut and did not wish to be named said he was less than 400m from the block when it was obliterated.

"Hezbollah came in to launch their rockets, then within minutes the area was blasted by Israeli jets," he said.

"Until the Hezbollah fighters arrived, it had not been touched by the Israelis. Then it was totally devastated.
"It was carnage. Two innocent people died in that incident, but it was so lucky it was not more."

The release of the images comes as Hezbollah faces criticism for allegedly using innocent civilians as "human shields".

Mr Egeland blasted Hezbollah as "cowards" for operating among civilians. "When I was in Lebanon, in the Hezbollah heartland, I said Hezbollah must stop this cowardly blending in among women"

http://lightonthings.blogspot.com - The Reality Show

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

19)    Good News about Finnish Media!                8 August 2006       

 

To share with you some good news about the media war in Finland, this important country for international co-operation, we simply quote the letter sent to us by Varpu Haavisto, editor of Take-A-Pen in Finland - or "Suomentakeapen". 

Read it and think of it, what a great influence the activity of a few brave people may have on a whole country

 

"Dear Endre!
I just want to tell you some good news from Finland: We get constantly new subscribers, and people have been actively writing to papers, many letters have been published. One solidarity march was organized in Helsinki in only four days in the 3rd of Aug, appr. 500 people attended, and the second one is going to happen in the 20th of Aug, and now with all the largest Israel friendship -societies as organizators, it will certainly collect thousands of people.
We've been sending translated material about Lebanon to our list, I also have exchanged mail with Helsingin sanomat and Aamulehti about the Qana incident and its suspected staging. Aamulehti's chief editor (! Aamulehti is the second largest paper in Finland !), M. Apunen, wrote last Sunday an excellent long story about the war criticizing openly many sick phenomena in the media. Also, Ilta-sanomat, the largest yellow paper published a couple of days ago an amazing column by J.P.Tikka about the staging of Qana under the title "Ordered tragedy".
All the best,
Varpu"

------------------------------------------------------------------------

20)   .July 14 ( Bastille-day) :
In 1791: the old Fortress of Bastille fell;  
in 2006: old Pretexts  like 'Israeli OCCUPATION' fell – but Arab TERROR is rising

Who is at fault?
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, July 14, 2006

  P

 

WASHINGTON -- Next June will mark the 40th anniversary of the Six Day War. For four decades we have been told that the cause of the anger, violence and terror against Israel is its occupation of the territories seized in that war. End the occupation, they say - and the "cycle of violence'' ceases. Does it?

The problem with this claim was that before Israel came into possession of the West Bank and Gaza in the Six Day War, every Arab state had rejected Israel's right to exist and declared Israel's pre-1967 borders -- now deemed sacred -- to be nothing more than the armistice lines suspending, and not ending, the 1948-49 war to exterminate Israel.

But you don't have to be a historian to understand the intention of Israel's enemies. You only have to read today's newspapers.

Exhibit A: Gaza. Just last September, Israel evacuated Gaza completely. It declared the border between Israel and Gaza an international frontier, renouncing any claim to the territory. Gaza became the first independent Palestinian territory in history. Yet the Gazans continued the war. They turned Gaza into a base for launching rocket attacks against Israel and for digging tunnels under the border to conduct attacks like the one that killed two Israeli soldiers on June 25 and yielded a wounded hostage brought back to Gaza. Israeli tanks have now had to return to Gaza to try to rescue the hostage and suppress the rocket fire.

Exhibit B: South Lebanon. Two weeks later, on July 12, the Lebanese terror organization, Hezbollah, which has representation in the Lebanese parliament and in the Cabinet, launched an attack into Israel that killed eight soldiers and wounded two, who were brought back to Lebanon as hostages.

What's the grievance here? Israel withdrew from Lebanon completely in 2000. It was so scrupulous in making sure that not one square inch of Lebanon was left inadvertently occupied that it asked the U.N. to verify the exact frontier defining Lebanon's southern border and retreated behind it. This "blue line'' was approved by the Security Council, which declared that Israel had fully complied with resolutions demanding its withdrawal from Lebanon.

Grievance satisfied. Yet what happens? Hezbollah has done to South Lebanon exactly what Hamas has done to Gaza: turn it into a military base and terrorist operations center from which to continue the war against Israel. South Lebanon bristles with Hezbollah's ten-thousand Katyusha rockets that put northern Israel under the gun. Fired in the first hours of fighting, just 85 of these killed two Israelis and wounded over 100 in Israel's northern towns.

Over the last six years, Hezbollah has launched periodic raids and rocket attacks into Israel. Israeli retaliation has led to the cessation of these provocations -- until the next time convenient for Hezbollah. Wednesday was such a time. One terror base located in fully unoccupied Arab territory (South Lebanon) attacks Israel in support of another terror base in another fully unoccupied Arab territory (Gaza).

Why? Because occupation was a mere excuse to persuade gullible and historically ignorant Westerners to support the Arab cause against Israel. The issue is, and has always been, Israel's existence. That is what is at stake.

 

 http://www.townhall.com/columnists/CharlesKrauthammer/2006/07/14/who_is_at_fault

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

21) The First Take-A-Pen Letter Ever - from the Mars!!!                        6 June 2006

 

Now I can distribute to you the letter - or rather op-ed - sent to THE INDEPENDENT, after they failed to publish it or to respond in any form. (Rather sad that a paper of The Independent's prestige and self-confidence does not have a standard complaint procedure like an independent ombudsman reading readers' letters - as it is for example in The Guardian - but it is another story).

 

The three matters the letter reflects to, may not bear much weight in themselves. The more important point is to illustrate, that we all DO HAVE THE RIGHT of such more comprehensive criticism, of even those overly self-confident media, like The Independent.

We have had a few successes with such actions in the past and receive very positive responses from our readers to this piece.

If you like it; feel free to distribute, with attribute to Take-A-Pen www.take-a-pen.org

 

E.M. 

 

----- Original Message -----

To: letters@independent.co.uk

Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 4:51 PM

 

Subject: LETTER FROM THE MARS

 

To: The Independent                                                                  

         Letter Editor                                                                           1 June 2006

Dear Sir;

I am from the Mars, making a longer trip on Earth. I am afraid that writing to you in Martian could be an inconvenience, therefore, with apologies, I am writing in my own pigeon English.

 

I know we Martians may have a wary name among you. What you may be less aware of is that we love the media, particularly a free, freely thinking press. We dislike media manipulations.  That is why we set up once an inter-orbital network of active media-watchers. And that is why I like so much your name 'The Independent' - I read you whenever I am in London.

Having been there now for three days I have read thoroughly your May 30 issue. May I tell you something on more than one article?

 

I enjoyed very much how Dominic Lawson in "A hard-line Marxist distortion of history" dared to tell clearly and argumented well with facts his question about Ken Loach's precious Cannes prize. Was the prize given by the French maybe more for the movie's fierce hatred of official Britain and America (as Loach himself explained), than for its - very real - artistic values? After the totally unison appraisals by the liberal choir, whitewashing even the IRA's pro-Nazi stance once, it was a thought-provokingly independent article to read, indeed.

 

Noam Chomsky's article and book "All washed up" (advertised on your front-page) seemed to present also a brave independent view. The subtitle "Why it's over for America" sounded as a real prophecy of wrath. However, after reading the worn-out arguments for his thesis and the total lack of any potential counter-argument in the article – leave alone the lack of their dialectic test – the illusion that we had seen another independent mind - was over.  What consoled me fully for the pale arguments was a brilliant Independent solution; by putting the two articles in the same issue you helped your readers to reach deeper understanding by a simple integration like this: "Why it is over for America, by Noam Chomsky - A hard-line Marxist distortion of history"

 

My third and last illustration shows the refreshingly diverse possible uses of the principle of independence.  The article "Lecturers' union supports boycott of 'apartheid' Israel" by your Education Editor, Richard Garner is a conspicuous sample of total independence from old-fashioned dry facts and boring balance. The writer leaves behind himself freely the obsolete warning that reverse commas do not entitle anyone to quote untrue and libelous statements. His free-flying imagination tells us what he believes is happening in "Palestine".  He is not stuck to small problems like that the country 'Palestine' – whether we like it or not – does not actually exist at present, only in Arab rhetoric. Or, that the article's title we saw is rather different from the subject of the vote as described within the same article ('urge their members to consider boycotting').

But Garner does tell us a few facts; like that the vote was won 106 to 71, and what were the names of two ardent anti-Israel activists and of the General Secretary of the union who spoke against the boycott. And then Garner quotes, in 43 full lines, unchallenged, the two anti-Israeli speakers, and for balance he quotes nil (zero) word of the General Secretary's anti-boycott call.

We, on the Mars, do also apply sometimes this un-balancing technique; we do it in cases when we do not want peace and reconciliation, but are preparing and want to justify a war instead. The editors responsible for this technique are not called 'Education Editors' on the Mars; we call them "Incitement Editors" and they enjoy great respect by warlords.

 

May I assure you that all-in-all I greatly enjoyed the substantial time I spent in The Independent's mental gym and intend to do it the next time I am in England too. I only hope that by then you'll return to the good old meaning of your beautiful name; The Independent.

 

Respectfully,

Endre Mozes

Chairman of Take-A-Pen

www.take-a-pen.org

Mars.  (Temporarily: Haifa, Israel)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

22)  Ideas About Denmark - and NOT about caricatures
                           Take-A-Pen editorial                                                                27 February 2006

Eyes of the international community are on Denmark, these days.

 

At first sight it is simple; we at Take-A-Pen strongly believe that no descent person would want to offend any religion. Even to legal humor and irony about religious matters there should be self-imposed limits and restraint (as the British used to say: "Gentlemen do not argue about religion").

But further we may have some less obvious ideas.

 

How did this story really start? A concise description of the events is that of Robert Spencer ("Thou shalt not Draw" in the FrontPageMagazine on December 21, 2005):

"Last September, Danish author Kåre Bluitgen was set to publish a book on the Muslim prophet Muhammad, but there was just one catch: he couldn’t find an illustrator. Artistic representations of the human form are forbidden in Islam (as in Judaism*), and pictures of Muhammad are especially taboo — so three artists turned down Bluitgen’s offer to illustrate the book for fear that they would pay with their lives for doing so.

Frants Iver Gundelach, president of the Danish Writers Union, decried this as a threat to free speech — and the largest newspaper in Denmark, Jyllands-Posten, responded. They approached forty (40*) artists asking for depictions of Muhammad and received in response twelve (12*) cartoons of the Prophet — several playing on the violence committed by Muslims in the name of Islam around the world today. "

 

The rest is history, ongoing and on-line history this time.

 

Our questions now are:

Did this story really start with the cartoons? Or, with what?

Are the caricatures the real issue and the goal?

Or, can the real issue be whether an old European democracy can hold his good old values upright, or, together with the 28 cartoonists of the 40 invited, prefers to keep distant, considering well the dangers, the Islamist threats and the deadly precedent of Theo Van Gogh?

Is it possible that the well-orchestrated global anti-Danish campaign has something to do with the Danes having had enough of Muslim mass immigration into Denmark and of Muslim hostility towards the hosts? Might it have something to do with the Danes having changed their government from liberal to conservative, and their immigration rules accordingly?

 

In July 2005 anarchists, allegedly Muslim immigrants, burned the private car of Denmark's Minister for Immigration and death threats to her and her family were voiced ("Anarchists torch minister's car and Denmark's ideals" - Irish Times, 10 June 2005).

Did the perpetrators take revenge already in July for the cartoons to come in October?  Or the new immigration laws of Denmark accepting immigrants less generously had actually been the real reason of the Muslim uproar against Denmark, and the cartoons were not much more than a pretext?

 

Having looked back to old times 'Before the Cartoons' (B.C.) let's have now a look towards the future; A.C., After the Cartoons'.

If not the cartoons, then what else can be the future goal of the well-orchestrated and Islam states-sponsored Islamist riots?

Some suggest as relevant for the analysis of the motives behind the riots that Denmark has the chair of the Counter-Terrorism Committee of the Security Council for the whole year of 2006.  Thus for any plans Islamist expansionism has for this year, it would be most helpful to intimidate Denmark and thus manipulate the agenda.

 

The cartoon riots are here probably to cover up to Islamist global ambitions and to discourage anti-terror acts like the designation of Islamist organizations or states as sponsors of terrorism.

Therefore the debates about the cartoons and the riots are much more important that they seem to be. Therefore we support and urge all of you, Danish Pen-friends in particular, to write now; to write to media and to politicians, for your values, for freedom of speech and of thought, write whatever you think, about any aspect of the cartoon crisis, but be sure to Express Yourself!

This may be a decisive debate for the future of your country and society, and maybe for even more.                                                                                                                                                                                      (E.M.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------